論馬英九的占星命盤

前幾天有綠營豬頭說馬英九不是香港出生的，逼總統府只好拿出香港出生證明澄清。1950年7月13日的占星命盤有兩大特點，火星與海王星合相於天秤座14度，以及木星與天王星三分相(準確120度)，此兩大特點都與出生時刻無關。

尤其是火星與海王星合相於天秤座14度這個特殊相位，馬英九一生之中命運的的關鍵，都與天秤座14度脫不了關係，此乃因火星與海王星合相於天秤座14度是命盤全局的龍頭領導也。

陳水扁及馬英九都是台大法律系畢業，陳水扁大三時就通過高考取得律師執照，這是陳水扁學歷的終點，馬英九的學歷終點是美國哈佛法學博士，馬英九在哈佛攻讀博士時期，正好是冥王星運行到天秤座14度。

馬英九命運的另外一個關鍵是1981辛酉雞年回國就直接進入總統府擔任蔣經國總統的英文秘書，查那個時候的星相絕對會讓大家嚇一跳：木星與土星正好都運行到天秤座14度。

由於每逢雞年木星都運行到天秤座14度，1993雞年，馬英九當上法務部長。2005雞年，馬英九居然得到中國國民黨黨主席之位！大家說奇不奇怪？

現在重點來了，2012年馬英九能否連任成功？答案先賣個關子，給大家一個提示：看民國一百年的土星。

路過

1.蔡同榮拿到馬唯中出生證明？王郁琦不評論真偽.

2.1997年1月21日，馬英九到香港廣華醫院申請出生證明.

3.為什麼會相當新? 看到這份保存了47年依然完好如新的資料，馬英九非常贊歎：“一家私人醫院，資料保存了近50年沒有變，而且還相當新。這保存的功夫怎麼做得到？”

4. 1950年廣東部分地區才解放。

從邏輯來看， 我看蔡的話有可信之處。

馬英九是歪嘴巴。幾天前我偶然想起命理上歪嘴巴的八字特征是...呵呵，我也賣個關子，台灣的高手多，俺就不搶版面。

偶也支持馬英九是1950年7月13日出生的，那麼重點來了，2012年馬英九能否連任成功？
章容舫兄用八字，偶用紫微，答案先賣個關子...
給大家一個提示:三忌沖2012年
另一個提示:綠營的豬頭爽呆啦

２００８年１２月１５日巳時八字如下：

己己甲戊
巳丑子子

甲子己丑天地相合。戊子己丑同旬一級相順。己土以子水為偏財貴人！！！

全部被合化土的爛八字,滿盤比劫..

再看看紫微斗數盤,就知道有多爛!!

日月同臨。坐貴向貴。正人君子之命。此乃兩岸人民之幸

殺破狼。胡攪蠻纏。巨門。搬弄是非。。。都是小人之命

kurich，您好﹕

1.剛巧路過。

2.說人豬頭，容易流為主觀意識，我個人淺見，任一專業領域不能參雜主觀過重，因容易不客觀的分析。

不必太認真啦 某些台灣人一談到政治 智商瞬間變回到兩三歲的小孩失去理智 失去觀察力 還會產生馬上好的錯覺 把別人推卸責任的推托之詞當成聖經

咳！您 聽聽就算了

至於馬英九會不會連任 我覺得機會蠻大的 因為他現在的做法完全是老蔣那一套 讓他繼續搞下去 別說連兩任 就算他想連任到死都有機會

台灣首航是上午8時11分松山機場起飛
對岸首航上午7時20分深圳起飛
巳時從何而來？
　

兩岸通航等了一甲子，今天上午十時「三港對十點齊發」，六艘國輪同步鳴笛，分別從基隆、台中、高雄三港出發，首航到對岸天津、上海、廣州、廈門等十大港，馬英九、劉兆玄將分別在高雄、基隆出席首航儀式。

台北股市大盤指數五年漲五倍。。。信不信由你

３９５５＊５＝１９７７５

kurich君

大三通目前也是熱鬧上場，但票價仍是相當亂

任何事不宜太早給定論

至少要觀察半年至一年以上

再來判斷政策是否成功，還是只是的短線炒做而已!

至於股市

情願務實客多也不要盡是投機客炒做!

2012年，看競選人的下巴，誰的下巴長的好，誰當選！

馬上好的兩萬點已經害慘一大票股民啦

你說五年*5=? 莫作孽喔.....

還有那個"豬頭"看得真的礙眼ㄟ 是否藍營的叫"籃趴"阿? 這樣不太好吧...

建議一下 參考參考 偶也是路過 不喜歡聽當偶沒講

蔡同榮（1935乙亥年6月13日－生肖屬豬），臺灣的政治人物、資深立法委員，是臺灣獨立與公民投票的主要推動者。現任民進黨不分區立委。

吉庚壬乙
時申午亥
大運　63乙亥　73甲戌

月柱與年柱均空亡日支申
2009己丑合去大運甲木偏財
2010庚寅合去年干乙木正財

大三通效應 面板運費省一成

【經濟日報╱記者邱馨儀、曾仁凱、何易霖、陳碧珠、李立達、蕭君暉／綜合報導】 2008.12.16 03:18 am

兩岸大三通昨（15）日啟動，為電子業注入利多， 面板廠預估將可降低5%至10%的運籌成本，兩岸存貨周轉天數也可再降低，等於直接降低成本；組裝廠如鴻海則可縮短距離、提升效率。品牌廠宏碁說，NB廠的核心製造能力將回流台灣。

兩岸昨天進入大三通時代。友達表示，初步估計，大三通後，對友達的全球運籌（主要是物流運輸）成本，可以節省5%至10%，而存貨周轉天數，也可以因減少在海上漂流的時間，再下降兩天左右，對LCD廠來說，算是一項福音。

面板廠從過去的筆記型電腦與液晶監視器，一路做到目前的液晶電視，尺寸也從十幾吋，一路放大到40至50吋，但尺寸愈大，體積愈重，空運的成本太高，對海運的依賴與需求因此愈來愈大。

面板都是在台灣做完中段灌液晶（cell）的製程後，再送至大陸完成後段模組（LCM）組裝，對兩岸貨物航運的依賴程度相當重，再運往北美、歐洲、日本與亞太等地區，組裝成液晶電視。

奇美電也指出，大三通當然可以降低面板業的成本，影響最大的就是運費降低與減少存貨，至於人員的交通雖然也有影響，但金額不大。以奇美電來說，大陸廠區的庫存量可以因此降低。

奇美集團目前以承租方式，向中外航運公司承租貨輪，從台南的安平港出海，以彎靠日本石垣島的方式，往來寧波、鎮江與安平港之間；大三通後省去第三地作業時間，不只節省運費，更重要的是兩岸存貨都可以減少，意義重大。

奇美電強調，奇美電深耕大陸平面電視內需市場，在廣州設有LCM廠，大三通有利當地客戶快速組裝，攻入市場，由於廣州是直航的航點之一，奇美電未來的成長動能更被看好。

鴻海發言人丁祈安昨天表示，大三通符合兩岸人民的期望，加速促進兩岸經貿交流，可以「提升效率、減少距離」，一日生活圈成形，避免社會資源被扭曲。

宏碁董事長王振堂說，過去兩岸不三通，NB代工等國內資訊業者被迫在上海或廣州複製一套核心能力，兩岸直飛後，交通變得相當方便，企業就可以把這套核心能力留在台灣，避免一些技術know-how被學走。

【2008/12/16 經濟日報】

乍看之下好像不錯 可惜丑庫未開 有進無出

己巳 己丑 夾了個 不見之形 己酉 需要做功 才有賺的希望

午年 卯年 可能不錯

辰年 大好或大壞 值得觀察

明年丑年不太樂觀 寅年紛爭不斷

現在比較有良心了,只喊19000多,不像之前騙人的20000點!!

這只是海運，難道三通不包含空運、通郵嗎？
　

看看國外的分析怎麼說 只想靠中國 有點危險


Gideon Rachman

China’s economy hits the wall


By Gideon Rachman

Published: December 15 2008 18:50 | Last updated: December 15 2008 18:50

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a1ff5944-cac6-11dd-87d7-000077b07658.html

There was a distinct whiff of triumphalism in Beijing in the weeks after the collapse of Lehman Brothers. Chinese officials speculated aloud about whether it would be wise to lend the Americans the money they needed to bail out their sinking banks. There was tut-tutting about American profligacy. The famous prediction by Goldman Sachs that the Chinese economy would be larger than that of the US by 2027 was revisited – perhaps it would happen even sooner than that?

But two months into the global financial crisis, things look much grimmer for China. In fact the only recent examples of social unrest in one of the world’s main economies have come there, not in the west. Laid-off workers in factories in southern China have staged protests that had to be contained by riot police. There have also been strikes and violent protests by taxi drivers in some cities across the country. The notion that the Chinese economy has so much momentum that it has “decoupled” from the US looks like a myth.

The economic statistics tell their own story. Last week the Chinese government announced that the country’s exports fell in November, compared with a year earlier, in the first such monthly drop for seven years. There are said to be 1 million new graduates looking for work. It is generally held that the Chinese economy needs to grow at 8 per cent a year to absorb all the new workers coming on to the market. But new projections suggest that Chinese growth next year will be lower than that – possibly much lower.

Chinese workers cannot express their discontent through the ballot box, so messages to the country’s political leaders are relayed through strikes and riots. Social unrest in China’s industrial heartlands will cause real alarm in the governing circles in Beijing. The urban middle-classes also have reason to be unhappy: there have been severe stock-market and property crashes in China over the past year. The government – like its western counterparts – has already made it clear that it will respond to the new downturn with a massive, fiscal stimulus package.

But the next 12 months will still be very difficult. The west’s recession – and the associated drop in consumer spending – will worsen. This will have the direct affect of depressing demand for Chinese goods. And it will have the indirect effect of heightening tensions between the US and China.

China’s trade surplus hit a new record last week because imports are falling even faster than exports. The Obama administration is certain to want China to allow its currency to appreciate, to close the deficit. But the domestic pressures on China will point in the other direction – to allow the renminbi to fall in value in an effort to boost exports and keep more factories open.

An atmosphere of economic crisis in both countries is unlikely to make the discussion any more civilised. Protectionism is already gaining ground in the US, with the proposed bail-out of the American car industry. Some of America’s senior trade experts are very worried that this is just the beginning. “Obama has wise economic advisers,” says one, “but the instincts they are surrendering to are quite disturbing.” Protectionism could take many forms. But if next year’s international talks on climate change run into trouble – as seems likely – pressure could grow for some sort of “carbon tariff” on Chinese goods.

Any rise in protectionism in America is liable to be swiftly emulated in the European Union, which is China’s largest market. At the moment, the Chinese government seems to feel it can afford to treat the Europeans with a degree of disdain. China recently cancelled a summit with the EU at a few days’ notice, to express displeasure at European leaders’ meetings with the Dalai Lama.

But trade is one area where the Union has enormous powers and acts as a single bloc. At the moment the European Commission is still in the hands of economic liberals. But a new commission will be appointed in 2009 and things could change. There are already strong protectionist pressures in countries such as Italy and France.

Next year will clearly be very tough for China. But over the past 20 years predicting the demise of the Chinese economic miracle – or the Chinese Communist party – has proved to be a mug’s game. For years western analysts have pointed to fundamental weaknesses in the Chinese economy. In the 1990s, it was popular to predict that the Chinese banking system would collapse. (Perhaps we were looking at the wrong banking system?) Environmental problems, shortages of energy and water and demographic imbalances are other Chinese weaknesses that have long been pored over.

But China has powered ever onwards. The country got through the political upheavals of 1989 and the Asian economic crisis of 1997, which also led to sharply slower growth and higher unemployment.

Still, the economic crisis of 2009 could pose the toughest tests that the Chinese government has faced since the student uprisings of 1989, whose 20th anniversary will fall next year. For it is now clear that, far from being immune to the global financial crisis, China is very vulnerable. Its economy may not be hit as hard as that of the US. But as a poorer country – with a less resilient political system – it could suffer worse.

It would be a historic irony if the Chinese Communist party was thrown into crisis, not by the collapse of communism in 1989 – but by the convulsions of capitalism in 2009.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2008

那是別人的意見 不夠客觀？？

看看新聞吧


China industry growth falls to fresh low

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d9e2909a-caaf-11dd-87d7-000077b07658.html

By Jamil Anderlini in Beijing

Published: December 15 2008 14:12 | Last updated: December 15 2008 14:12

China’s industrial output growth fell to a fresh low in November, providing further proof that the country’s economy has been hit more severely by the global economic crisis than anticipated.

Industrial production growth dropped to 5.4 per cent, down from 8.2 per cent in October, as exports fell the most in nearly a decade and the real estate sector continued to decline, official data showed on Monday.


“Excluding holiday-related distortions, this is the weakest result since the series first began in 1994,” said Ben Simpfendorfer, an economist for Royal Bank of Scotland in Hong Kong. “As a result, 5 per cent GDP growth in the first half of 2009 is now a reality, not a risk.”

Dominique Strauss-Kahn, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, told reporters in Madrid on Monday that next year “China will probably grow at 5 or 6 percent”.

Heavy industry saw the biggest contraction in November, particularly in sectors which make materials for the building industry. Steel production fell 12 per cent last month.

“The data will turn uglier and risks remain biased to even slower growth,” Mr Simpfendorfer said. “It’s urgent for fiscal easing to provide some support to a contracting heavy industrial sector.”

The speed and severity of China’s downturn has caught Beijing at unawares and prompted a flurry of policy measures aimed at boosting faltering growth.

The governing State Council released a “30-point plan” over the weekend calling on the central bank and state-owned lenders to do everything in their power to avoid a pronounced slowdown and deflation.

The plan set a monetary growth target of 17 per cent in 2009, which would boost the money supply by Rmb7,700bn and provide a huge flood of liquidity aimed at ensuring the economy can grow by the government’s target of 8 per cent, according to Qu Hongbin, an HSBC economist in Hong Kong.

The plan also promised regulatory relief for the beleaguered stock market and further credit support measures for first-time homebuyers and the real estate sector.

“The best thing China can do [about the global slowdown] is maintain policies that support its own growth,” Robert Zoellick, World Bank president, said in Beijing on Monday. “China has already taken some important steps.”

In early November, Beijing announced a Rmb4,000bn economic stimulus package aimed at restarting the economy through massive infrastructure investment through 2010. In the following weeks, it emerged that the central government intended to spend just Rmb1,180bn to encourage local governments, state-owned and private companies to invest the remaining sum.

Even government experts have warned that many local governments are already deeply indebted. The current crisis has led to a collapse in tax revenues that has worsened their plight.

“Recession and deflation alarms are ringing loudly in China,” said Sherman Chan, an analyst at Moody’s credit rating agency, in a report. “Despite its determination, the government will find it difficult to ignite domestic growth amid rising unemployment.”

Widespread layoffs, particularly in the construction and export sectors, have already sparked numerous protests and riots across the country and officials have repeatedly warned that if growth falls below 8 per cent the government may be unable to manage the resulting social instability.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2008

還不相信中國自身難保？？

有空自己看看真正的新聞吧

http://www.ft.com/world/asiapacific/china

別在相信染紅過的中國廣告啦